A photo of the A5s in action. Wow, it's hard to take a photo of black speakers in a dark room!
(you can see my little fuzzy "helper" there on the right)
A photo of the A5s in action. Wow, it's hard to take a photo of black speakers in a dark room!
(you can see my little fuzzy "helper" there on the right)
Cool Pano!
.....but DAMN your chair is close to those suckers!
Russ
Yeah, closer than it should be. 9-10 feet. But not too bad. They do look like they'll part your hair. But they are usually well behaved.
One of these days I'll knock out a wall and turn the room the other way. Should give me about 15-20 to the speakers. Some day.
Hey A.B. Yes, reducing the port area helps the bass. More extended, less boomy.
Not finished yet. Software simulations say that tuning the box to about 30Hz should give the best results. Well, we shall see. These things don't seem to respond like modern drivers in modern boxes. Will use three 3" I.D. pipes for ports.
I think that Bear did something similar a couple of years back and liked the results.
Stay tuned! (sorry...)
When rebuilding my A7's I called GPA and asked them for a recommendation on port size relative to the 416-8B's response I had just installed. After awhile they called me back and recommended I reduce the port size to 3.25in. X 26in. This equates to 84.5 sq. in. The bass I hear seems quite natural.
The original port size is 28in. X 7.75in. or 217 sq. in. I have also heard of reducing the port to as small as 75 sq. in. I believe it all depends on the bass driver being used and the listeners personal preference.
In any case, if you want natural sounding bass in an A7 (825/828) cabinet, the port size must be reduced. As in a thread earlier, using removable panels to reduce the port size to your particular listening style is probably the best course. However, I am satisfied with the results from my A7's.
Bookmarks